Tea cup

  • rss
  • archive
  • theartofanimation:

    Floriane Grivillers

    Source: theartofanimation
    • 4 days ago
    • 1121 notes
  • fairytalemood:

    “The Little Mermaid” by Ileana Surducan

    (via burstinglight)

    Source: behance.net
    • 1 week ago
    • 22600 notes
  • lesincompetent:

    I’m gonna reblog this until everyone in existence knows about this

    (via herpingsomederp)

    Source: videohall
    • 1 week ago
    • 210247 notes
  • cocaine-and-insulin:

miakosamuio:

mishastolemywormstache:

sandandglass:

CNN actually researched how much it would cost to go to Hogwarts

#NO WONDER THE WEASLEYS ARE FUCKING BROKE

How exactly did they “research” this? Looks like they just pulled a bunch of random figures out of their butts.
It’s stated in the books that tuition to Hogwarts is “free for all children in Britain”. I don’t know why they thought it wouldn’t be - it’s a British high school, not a college. So there, you just saved yourself $42,024.
In Chamber of Secrets, Mrs. Weasley emptied her entire bank account which contained only two galleons [£10 / US$20] and she managed to buy all five children’s entire set of books and potion ingredients with this, as well as Ginny’s robes, hat, clock, cauldron, and wand!!! And we know she bought all of these as she mentioned having to buy them. The fact that she bought all of these with only £10 pretty much proves how absolutely ridiculous CNNs estimation is.
If you want more proof, the actual cost of Harry’s wand is far over estimated here, and the exact price in both pounds as US dollars can easily be found right within the books! Harry’s wand is bought for seven galleons, a galleon being worth about five pounds [mentioned by JK Rowling in an interview and in FBAWTFT/QTTA] means that his wand was £35, or US$53. So there’s some straight-out-of-the-books-and-word-of-god proof that the figures CNN have given are way off the mark. Not to mention the fact that even if you don’t go to Hogwarts, as a magical human you’re gonna have to buy a wand anyway if you want to do magic.
As for the school books, I’ve done an approximation based on various prices given through-out the books and on Pottermore. While these prices involve a substantial amount of guess-work, I think you’ll agree that my calculation is far more accurate than CNNs:
The Standard book of Spells costs one sickle [29p / US59c]. On the back of my comic relief copy of Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them it says it costs fourteen sickles [£4.60 / US$8.26]. One Pottermore, all text books are one galleon [£4.97  / US$10.17] - however Pottermore currency only uses galleons so it’s likely they have rounded off. Lockhart’s books, the most expensive in the series, are five galleons on Pottermore meaning that the exchange rate in the books puts them around two galleons and fourteen sickles [£14.60 / US$20.80]. If we put a high average on this and assume that all textbooks are approximately a galleon [they are likely much less], and that each year has around seven required reading books, the entire price for seven years worth of books would be forty-nine galleons, which equals approximately £243, or US$367 - and remember, this is the maximum estimated price for the textbooks.
For the minimum, we need to consider that the Weasleys get a lot of things second hand, with Ginny’s copy of A Begginers Guide To Transfiguration being described as “a very old, very battered copy” - likely no more than five sickles. If they got all their books around that price, it would cost them no more than £14 / US$21 for the entire seven years worth! So school books, far from being US$516, fall somewhere between US$14 and US$367 for the entire seven years at Hogwarts.
Next we have robe, glove, cloak, and hat prices - these are never mentioned in the books or on Pottermore, so I can’t account for that. However I seriously doubt it’s as a high as they’ve got here. Considering books in the wizarding world are generally much cheaper than in the muggle world, I think it’s fairly safe to assume that clothing is as well. Likely a maximum of a galleon for a single set of robes.
They’ve also forgotten a huge number of things - cauldrons, potion ingredients, scales, and star charts, among others.
So yeah, I really don’t know where they came up with these figures. It looks like some guy just wanted to make a story about how expensive Hogwarts would be and put a bunch of American college figures together and thought “yeah, this looks good.”

Do not fuck with a fandom.

In love with my fandom <3

    cocaine-and-insulin:

    miakosamuio:

    mishastolemywormstache:

    sandandglass:

    CNN actually researched how much it would cost to go to Hogwarts

    #NO WONDER THE WEASLEYS ARE FUCKING BROKE

    How exactly did they “research” this? Looks like they just pulled a bunch of random figures out of their butts.

    It’s stated in the books that tuition to Hogwarts is “free for all children in Britain”. I don’t know why they thought it wouldn’t be - it’s a British high school, not a college. So there, you just saved yourself $42,024.

    In Chamber of Secrets, Mrs. Weasley emptied her entire bank account which contained only two galleons [£10 / US$20] and she managed to buy all five children’s entire set of books and potion ingredients with this, as well as Ginny’s robes, hat, clock, cauldron, and wand!!! And we know she bought all of these as she mentioned having to buy them. The fact that she bought all of these with only £10 pretty much proves how absolutely ridiculous CNNs estimation is.

    If you want more proof, the actual cost of Harry’s wand is far over estimated here, and the exact price in both pounds as US dollars can easily be found right within the books! Harry’s wand is bought for seven galleons, a galleon being worth about five pounds [mentioned by JK Rowling in an interview and in FBAWTFT/QTTA] means that his wand was £35, or US$53. So there’s some straight-out-of-the-books-and-word-of-god proof that the figures CNN have given are way off the mark. Not to mention the fact that even if you don’t go to Hogwarts, as a magical human you’re gonna have to buy a wand anyway if you want to do magic.

    As for the school books, I’ve done an approximation based on various prices given through-out the books and on Pottermore. While these prices involve a substantial amount of guess-work, I think you’ll agree that my calculation is far more accurate than CNNs:

    The Standard book of Spells costs one sickle [29p / US59c]. On the back of my comic relief copy of Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them it says it costs fourteen sickles [£4.60 / US$8.26]. One Pottermore, all text books are one galleon [£4.97  / US$10.17] - however Pottermore currency only uses galleons so it’s likely they have rounded off. Lockhart’s books, the most expensive in the series, are five galleons on Pottermore meaning that the exchange rate in the books puts them around two galleons and fourteen sickles [£14.60 / US$20.80]. If we put a high average on this and assume that all textbooks are approximately a galleon [they are likely much less], and that each year has around seven required reading books, the entire price for seven years worth of books would be forty-nine galleons, which equals approximately £243, or US$367 - and remember, this is the maximum estimated price for the textbooks.

    For the minimum, we need to consider that the Weasleys get a lot of things second hand, with Ginny’s copy of A Begginers Guide To Transfiguration being described as “a very old, very battered copy” - likely no more than five sickles. If they got all their books around that price, it would cost them no more than £14 / US$21 for the entire seven years worth! So school books, far from being US$516, fall somewhere between US$14 and US$367 for the entire seven years at Hogwarts.

    Next we have robe, glove, cloak, and hat prices - these are never mentioned in the books or on Pottermore, so I can’t account for that. However I seriously doubt it’s as a high as they’ve got here. Considering books in the wizarding world are generally much cheaper than in the muggle world, I think it’s fairly safe to assume that clothing is as well. Likely a maximum of a galleon for a single set of robes.

    They’ve also forgotten a huge number of things - cauldrons, potion ingredients, scales, and star charts, among others.

    So yeah, I really don’t know where they came up with these figures. It looks like some guy just wanted to make a story about how expensive Hogwarts would be and put a bunch of American college figures together and thought “yeah, this looks good.”

    Do not fuck with a fandom.

    In love with my fandom <3

    (via adammlligan)

    Source: sandandglass
    • 2 months ago
    • 175691 notes
  • alicexz:

The “get these fucking prints out of my sight” giveaway
So, I have an Epson Stylus Photo R3000 printer 
I use it for the high-quality 13”x19” Limited Ed. prints in my official shop but recently it has been out to make my head explode by casually putting a random ink splotch on otherwise perfect prints
I am seething with rage!!!!! because it only happens randomly so I don’t know what’s wrong and also I use very expensive paper and ink SO EACH TINY SPLATTER costs me a fuckload 
I don’t want to throw out the prints because they look fine otherwise but I also can’t look at them any longer cause THEY ARE FAILURES AND MAKE ME SO ANGRY!!!! 
People who follow me on Twitter can attest to my total meltdown and tantrum because of this
They’ve suggested that I sell them as discounted Artist’s Proofs or something but INSTEAD I am going to do a giveaway 
Next Saturday, March 16th, I will pick one or two losers 
winners to receive these prints free of charge. They normally cost $80-$95, and I don’t sell some of these pieces anywhere else, so I figure if anyone wants ‘em and doesn’t mind the imperfections…
The prints are 13”x19” and will be signed and dated and marked “PROOF.” I’ll ship anywhere.
I don’t fucking care how many times you reblog 
But try and reblog at least once because the goal is that maybe someone who sees this post is a Printer Whisperer and can tell me why the fuck my printer is being such a douchebag 
I don’t fucking care if you’re following me 
Get these fuckiNG FAILURES out of my sight!!!!11 

Loki!!

    alicexz:

    The “get these fucking prints out of my sight” giveaway

    • So, I have an Epson Stylus Photo R3000 printer
    • I use it for the high-quality 13”x19” Limited Ed. prints in my official shop but recently it has been out to make my head explode by casually putting a random ink splotch on otherwise perfect prints
    • I am seething with rage!!!!! because it only happens randomly so I don’t know what’s wrong and also I use very expensive paper and ink SO EACH TINY SPLATTER costs me a fuckload
    • I don’t want to throw out the prints because they look fine otherwise but I also can’t look at them any longer cause THEY ARE FAILURES AND MAKE ME SO ANGRY!!!!
    • People who follow me on Twitter can attest to my total meltdown and tantrum because of this
    • They’ve suggested that I sell them as discounted Artist’s Proofs or something but INSTEAD I am going to do a giveaway
    • Next Saturday, March 16th, I will pick one or two losers winners to receive these prints free of charge. They normally cost $80-$95, and I don’t sell some of these pieces anywhere else, so I figure if anyone wants ‘em and doesn’t mind the imperfections…
    • The prints are 13”x19” and will be signed and dated and marked “PROOF.” I’ll ship anywhere.
    • I don’t fucking care how many times you reblog
    • But try and reblog at least once because the goal is that maybe someone who sees this post is a Printer Whisperer and can tell me why the fuck my printer is being such a douchebag
    • I don’t fucking care if you’re following me
    • Get these fuckiNG FAILURES out of my sight!!!!11

    Loki!!

    Source: alicexz
    • 2 months ago
    • 41503 notes
  • James and Oliver Phelps visit Harry Potter: The Exhibition, February 2013.

    I saw them!!

    (via adammlligan)

    Source: pranksandbooks
    • 2 months ago
    • 291 notes
  • adventuretitan:

blackcowledbat:

gloomysandwichgirl:

miraclemother:

gluttonythesin:

87directions:



I LOVE LIFE.
I’M GONNA DO THIS THE NEXT TIME I’M HIGH.


I FUCKING LOVE THIS




…Oh my word.


omg what was that

okay, who’s got some weed to make this better?

It’s a nyan cat thing and it hurts my eyes

    adventuretitan:

    blackcowledbat:

    gloomysandwichgirl:

    miraclemother:

    gluttonythesin:

    87directions:

    image

    I LOVE LIFE.

    I’M GONNA DO THIS THE NEXT TIME I’M HIGH.

    image

    I FUCKING LOVE THIS

    image

    image

    …Oh my word.

    image

    omg what was that

    okay, who’s got some weed to make this better?

    It’s a nyan cat thing and it hurts my eyes

    Source: xhiao1994.com
    • 3 months ago
    • 229325 notes
  • skoothsmin:

oxboxer:

feferipixies:

the-fandoms-are-cool:

everythingis19:

cosmicsyzygy:

Look, I made a gif of this most awesome wizard at the Leaky Cauldron!

DUDE IS READING ‘A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME’ BY STEPHEN HAWKING
I NEVER REALIZED

are you serious
I always assumed wizards just ignored science, because the fact that “magic” exists, can explain anything. But there are MuggleBorn wizards, ones who, until they were eleven, lived in the real world and learned science and things. Did they all just abandon that normal, muggle knowledge, like Harry did? It’s always been there, itching in the back of my mind.
FOUR FOR YOU SCIENCE WIZARD
YOU GO SCIENCE WIZARD

can we point out that he’s doing wandless magic too
like voldemort couldnt even do that shit
molly fuckin weasley couldnt fuckin do that
who are you

Quick, somebody write a book series about the adventures of Magic Prodigy Science Wizard!!!
PLEASE SOMEONE JUST DO IT

I’m suddenly really interested in this character.

He is Ian Brown, the singer of The Stone Roses =)

    skoothsmin:

    oxboxer:

    feferipixies:

    the-fandoms-are-cool:

    everythingis19:

    cosmicsyzygy:

    Look, I made a gif of this most awesome wizard at the Leaky Cauldron!

    DUDE IS READING ‘A BRIEF HISTORY OF TIME’ BY STEPHEN HAWKING

    I NEVER REALIZED

    are you serious

    I always assumed wizards just ignored science, because the fact that “magic” exists, can explain anything. But there are MuggleBorn wizards, ones who, until they were eleven, lived in the real world and learned science and things. Did they all just abandon that normal, muggle knowledge, like Harry did? It’s always been there, itching in the back of my mind.

    FOUR FOR YOU SCIENCE WIZARD

    YOU GO SCIENCE WIZARD

    can we point out that he’s doing wandless magic too

    like voldemort couldnt even do that shit

    molly fuckin weasley couldnt fuckin do that

    who are you

    Quick, somebody write a book series about the adventures of Magic Prodigy Science Wizard!!!

    PLEASE SOMEONE JUST DO IT

    I’m suddenly really interested in this character.

    He is Ian Brown, the singer of The Stone Roses =)

    (via bbanditt)

    Source: cosmicsyzygy
    • 4 months ago
    • 205999 notes
  • (via bbanditt)

    Source: sandandglass
    • 8 months ago
    • 40608 notes
  • lisaveeee:

    sveltte:

    Oh boy I hope I did this right. Since Anon asked, here’s a hasty tutorial on how I do flat colors. This is also how I color pretty much everything in my webcomic. Now you know my secrets!

    (via bbanditt)

    Source: sveltte
    • 8 months ago
    • 11023 notes
© 2012–2013 Tea cup
Next page
  • Page 1 / 3